Runtime Language Concepts: API Provider, API Client, API Gateway
Note: Work in progress still (the protocol bindings in particular)!
The language concepts described here can be used for context mapping, deployment modeling, and code generation (e.g., walking provider skeletons, test clients). Unlike endpoint types and data contracts, they play on the “instance” rather than the “class” level (just like ports in WSDL are instances of port types).
We assume this simple contract to exist (note that this example also feature the optional, global
API description HelloWorldDemoAPI overview "Demonstrating optional/runtime concepts" endpoint type SomeDemoContract exposes operation sayHello expecting payload D<string> delivering payload D<int>
An API provider exposes one or more endpoint contracts at an address that understands a particular platform-specific protocol:
API provider sampleProvider offers SomeDemoContract at endpoint location "http://www.tbc.io:80/path/subpath" via protocol HTTP binding resource Home // or other supported protocol under conditions "See http://www.tbc.io/terms-and-conditions.html" provider governance AGGRESSIVE_OBSOLESCENCE
At present, the following protocols are predefined:
HTTP SOAP_HTTP gRPC Java
It is also possible to define a custom protocol by including its name in double quotes:
"Some other protocol".1
A more complete example, also featuring an SLA and evolution governance information, looks like this:
API provider SampleAPIProvider1 offers SomeDemoContract at endpoint location "http://www.testdomain.io:80/path/subpath" via protocol HTTP binding resource SampleAPIProvider1Resource with endpoint SLA // provider1Endpoint1SLA type QUANTITATIVE // optional now objective performanceSLO1 "responseTimeUnder" 5 seconds penalty "If the SLA is not met, the penalty is ..." notification "To report SLA violations, you have to ..." rate plan USAGE_BASED rate limit MAX_CALLS 5 within 24 hours endpoint governance AGGRESSIVE_OBSOLESCENCE with provider SLA // provider1SLA type QUALITATIVE objective performanceSLO2 "availability" 100 "every commercially reasonable effort, but not guaranteed" provider governance TWO_IN_PRODUCTION
The language elements in the endpoint and provider SLA sections model the elements an SLA is supposed to contain according to the SLA pattern page on the MAP website.
See bindings page.
The consumers of endpoint contracts (API clients) are modeled according to the following template:
API client SampleAPIClient consumes SomeDemoContract from SampleAPIProvider1 via protocol HTTP
Clients merely have to decide which APIs to consume and which protocol to use to do so.
API gateways are hybrid providers (in upstream role) and clients (downstream role):
API gateway SampleAPIGatweway offers SomeDemoContract at endpoint location "ExternalURI" via protocol SOAP_HTTP consumes SomeDemoContract from SampleAPIProvider1 via protocol gRPC
API Provider Implementation
An API provider has an upstream interface (see bindings), but also a downstream implementation (which is not visible to its external client, but still worth specifying internally):
ProviderImplementation: 'API' 'provider' 'implementation' name=ID 'realizes' upstreamBinding=[Provider] 'in' platform=ImplementationTechnology ('as' class=STRING ('extending' superclass=STRING)? // default assigned if not specified ; enum ImplementationTechnology: PlainJava | SpringMVC | STRING // more to be added ;
An example of an instance of such provider binding is:
API provider implementation SampleAPIProvider1Impl realizes SampleAPIProvider1 in PlainJava as "co.something.model.SomeClassName" extending "Entity" // or: with binding SomeJavaBinding (if defined)
- Language specification:
- Quick reference, tutorial and tools
- Back to MDSL homepage.
Copyright: Olaf Zimmermann, 2018-2021. All rights reserved. See license information.
In this case, future MDSL tools cannot be expected to be able to process the specification fully (unless a suited plugin is available). ↩